\documentclass[a4papar,12pt]{article}

\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{multirow}

\usepackage{fourier}

\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{xcolor}

\begin{document}

\title{Training Report A}
\author{NowOrNever}
\date{April 13, 2014}
\maketitle

\begin{tabular}{ll}
	\textbf{Problem Set:} & OpenCup 140413. \\
	%\textbf{URL:}         & \url{http://codeforces.com/gym/100}. \\
	\textbf{Result:}      & 7/9. \\
	\textbf{Rank:}        & 11th. \\
\end{tabular}

\section{Simple Logs}
	Up to 1:20, 5 problems were passed.
	CLJ passed B using 13 min;
	CLJ passed F using 15 min;
	CLJ passed G using 30 min;
	WQS passed I using 10 min;
	FQW passed D using 9+25 min.
	From 1:20 to 1:39 the computer was idle.

	From 1:39 to 1:45 (6 min) WQS wrote C but got WA.

	From 1:56 to 2:29 (33 min) FQW wrote E with 'proven' wrong algorithm; got WA.

	From 2:29 to 2:38 (9 min) WQS modified his C and got AC (15 + 33 min).

	From 3:21 to 3:45 (24 min) WQS wrote H and passed.

	During the spare time (2:38 - 3:21, 3:45 - end) FQW modified and finally
		rewrote his E, but failed to passed since the algorithm was wrong.

\section{Our Mistakes}

\subsection{FQW}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item My fault.  I should think more about the raw, unproven ideas.
			Also I should understand others' proof of the claims.
	\end{itemize}

\subsection{WQS}

\subsection{CLJ}

\end{document} 
